FOLLOW US: @TheStatesmanLtd @thestatesmanltd thestatesman1875 www.thestatesman.com People’s Parliament, Always in Session India’s National Newspaper since 1818 | Pages 46 | ` 5.00 | KOLKATA LC | NEW DELHI | MUMBAI | BHUBANESWAR | Myth of consent High-level Pak team in Tehran pushes for second round of negotiations PERSPECTIVE Wars are affecting the environment Page 9 Page 6 Page 7 No discrimination in delimitation, says PM VIBHA SHARMA New Delhi, 16 April P rime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday assured Opposition parties that there would be no discrimination in the proposed delimitation exercise based on the 2011 Census data linked to the implementation of 33 per cent reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state assemblies. PM Modi said that if the word “guarantee” is required, he was willing to use it. “If you talk about a promise, I use the word ‘promise’. If there is a better word in Tamil, I am also ready to use that. If the intent is clear, we do not need to play games with words,” he said, pitching for the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill and allied legislations as a defining moment for India’s parliamentary democracy. He called on all parties to rise above politics and seize a “historic opportunity” to reshape governance with greater inclusivity. At the same time, he also warned that those opposing the amendments “will have to pay the price for a long time.” “Women have not forgotten those who stood against their rights,” he said, seeking unanimous support for the Women’s Reservation Amendment Bill being discussed in the House. “Jo aaj virodh karenge, unko lambe samay tak keemat chukani padegi,” he said, urging Opposition parties not to create a “bavandar” (tornado) for political gains. Stressing that the delimitation process would not discriminate against any region or group, he said: “I want to say responsibly today that this will not discriminate against anyone. This decisionmaking process will not be unfair. The ratio that has been in place since the earlier government’s delimitation will remain unchanged.” He also reiterated that the purpose of the amendments was solely to ensure women receive their rightful share. “We should not live in the illusion that we are giving something to women. I use the word ‘we’ and not ‘I’ and ‘you’. It is their right, and we have kept it pending for several decades. Today is our opportunity to correct that,” he said. “I am ready to give a blank cheque of credit to the Opposition for their support to the women’s reservation. Do not weigh it on a political scale. This will strengthen the country’s democracy and collective decision-making,” he said. • Delimitation an attempt to fragment Bengal, says Mamata: Page 2 • More reports: Pages 4, 5 Oppn forces division as women’s bill introduced STATESMAN NEWS SERVICE New Delhi, 16 April The Lok Sabha on Thursday approved the introduction of the Constitution (One Hundred and Thirty-First Amendment) Bill, 2026, setting the stage for a high-stakes political battle over women’s reservation and delimitation, after the Opposition forced a division of votes to formally register its dissent during the ongoing special session of Parliament. The bill was moved by Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal, marking a key step in advancing the government’s proposal to provide one-third reservation for women in the Lok Sabha and state legislative assemblies, alongside a Trump says Israel and Lebanon have agreed to a 10-day ceasefire Washington: Israel and Lebanon have agreed to a 10-day ceasefire, President Donald Trump announced Thursday, two days after the countries held their first direct diplomatic talks in decades in Washington. The truce that Mr Trump said was scheduled to begin at 5 p.m. Eastern Time follows more than a month of war between Israel and the Iran-backed Hezbollah militant group in Lebanon. Lebanon has insisted on a ceasefire to stop the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah before engaging in more talks, while vowing to commit to disarming the group. Mr Trump also invited the leaders of Israel and Lebanon to the White House for what he said would be “the first meaningful talks” between the countries since 1983. “Both sides want to see PEACE, and I believe that will happen, quickly,” Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. THE INTRODUCTION TRIGGERED SHARP RESISTANCE FROM THE OPPOSITION, WHICH ACCUSED THE CENTRE OF ATTEMPTING TO DELAY THE IMPLEMENTATION OF WOMEN’S RESERVATION BY LINKING IT TO THE COMPLETION OF THE CENSUS AND A SUBSEQUENT DELIMITATION EXERCISE. nationwide delimitation exercise. The motion for introduction was carried through a formal vote after Opposition members demanded a recorded division, reflecting the contentious nature of the reform. In addition to the Constitution Amendment Bill, the government introduced the Delimitation Bill, 2026, and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah tabling the latter. Parliamentary Affairs Minister | SILIGURI | Friday, 17 April 2026 SPORTS WORLD EDITORIAL LUCKNOW Kiren Rijiju and Mr Shah clarified that the bills were only being introduced at this stage, with detailed discussions to follow in the House. Collectively, the three legislations propose sweeping structural changes to India’s electoral framework, including increasing the strength of the Lok Sabha from 543 seats to a maximum of 850 and reserving one-third of seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies ~ moves the government has described as historic steps toward more inclusive representation. However, the introduction triggered sharp resistance from the Opposition, which accused the Centre of attempting to delay the implementation of women’s reservation by linking it to the completion of the Census and a subsequent delimitation exercise. Congress leader K C Venugopal opposed all three Bills in the House, formally placing his party’s objections on record and alleging that the government was undermining constitutional principles. “The government wants to completely hijack the Constitution,” he said, as the Opposition members pressed for clarity on timelines and intent. Bayern Munich knock out Real Madrid to reach Champions League semifinals Page 12 SC directs ECI to allow Bengal claimants to vote if tribunals clear names before poll date STATESMAN NEWS SERVICE New Delhi, 16 April The Supreme Court, invoking powers under Article 142 of the Constitution, has directed the Election Commission of India (ECI) to ensure that wherever claims of excluded voters are allowed by the Appellate Tribunals before the polling dates between 23 and 29 April, their names are incorporated in a supplementary revised electoral rolls to entitle them to exercise their right to vote. The decision, originally pronounced during the 13 April hearing in the West Bengal SIR case, was formally affirmed today through a detailed order uploaded on the Court's official website. In its order, the bench led by the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant also clarified that merely having an appeal pending before the Appellate Tribunal would not entitle an excluded person to vote. “Therefore, invoke our powers CM Mamata hails Supreme Court verdict on cancelled voters, issues directive to party workers: Kolkata: Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee on Thursday welcomed the Supreme Court’s ruling allowing previously excluded voters to cast their ballots, calling it a major victory for democracy. She congratulated the people of the state and expressed pride in the judiciary, while also issuing clear instructions to Trinamul Congress workers ahead of the polls. Speaking to reporters at a helipad in Cooch Behar after arriving from Dinhata as part of her campaign tour in North Bengal, Miss Banerjee said: “Congratulations to everyone. I received the good news while boarding the helicopter from Dinhata. I had been urging everyone to remain patient from the beginning. I am very happy and proud of the judiciary. I had filed the case myself, so no one is happier than me today.” Referring to the legal battle over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, the Chief Minister reiterated her role in approaching the Supreme Court on the matter. The case addressed concerns surrounding voters whose names were excluded from the rolls despite ongoing verification and tribunal processes. under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and direct the ECI that, wherever the Appellate Tribunals can decide the appeals by 21 April 2026, or 27 April, as the case may be, such appellate orders shall be given effect to by issuing a supplementary revised electoral roll, and all necessary consequences with respect to the right to vote shall follow. However, it goes without saying that the mere pendency of appeals preferred by excluded persons before the Appellate Tribunals shall not entitle them to exercise their right to vote,” the Court noted in its order. The Court has listed the matter for the next hearing on 24 April. On 13 April, the Court had verbally remarked that the people whose names have been excluded from the voter list and whose appeals are pending to be adjudicated before the Appellate Tribunals would be allowed to vote if their names are included after final adjudication.